I quickly realized that my questions were less about fundraising, and more about mobilizing people. What makes people get involved... the sold-out, life-long customer, complete evangelist type involved? Answering this question will easily answer the resource question. We all want people like this in our movement. We want more sold-out volunteers, referring customers, true fans. Nothing is more exciting and full of world-changing potential than a groundswell... a movement of committed and passionate people.
So... what makes this type of movement happen? How is it sustained, cultivated, grown? How is the impact measured? What kind of resources can be generated from a movement?
My project has changed from studying fundraising to studying organizations that create movements, both non-profit and for-profit. I will be particularly focused on these aspects:
- How do these movements form/begin?
- What sustains them?
- What kind of impact can they have? (and how is impact measured?)
- How are they resourced (funds, manpower)?
- What have these organizations done differently than others to catalyze a movement of people?
I have chosen five case-studies for the project: Invisible Children, Kiva, Obama's 2008 political campaign, TOMS shoes, and Kickstarter.
*Note: There are many organizations out there I could have chosen from. These above are controversial for different reasons. While I will be addressing impact, I will not spend much time debating the pros and cons of each organizations chosen methods to affect change. I'm not as much studying the strategy they use to make change in the world, but more their ability to mobilize so many people towards their cause, and if that mobilization makes a difference.
I'm trying to find and study that intangible buzz, momentum, and commitment that these organizations have generated. I want to know why and how it happened. And ultimately I want to find out how we can all benefit from what they've discovered.
I'll enjoy learning about the groups that you chose Sarah! I have basic familiarity with all of them and each of them are great models.
ReplyDeleteThey obviously all inspired folks to a high degree to get to where they are now.
Obama's campaign was definitely a game-changer in both their use of "new media" and micro-donations. Ironically, I think their use of SoMe set up a template for the Tea Party movement.
I always thought that if you involved/inspired folks to relevantly use their time and talents in your cause/org; then you'd naturally get their treasury (IMO this is the biggest obstacle for IV fund development).
Thanks for the inclusion Sarah as I love learning from you sistah!
Hi Joon! Thanks for jumping in so fast! Yes, I really agree with your third paragraph... and we (meaning IV) have tried so much to do this, but we're still missing the mark somehow. I'm hoping this research will shed some light.
ReplyDeleteExcited that you're here!
Great idea to document this journey. Its a fascinating subject, I can't wait to hear more
ReplyDeleteHa Ha! Apparently I have the most free time of all the folks you invited... not sure what that says about me.
ReplyDeleteAnyhow, I suspect that one of the flaws in getting folks involved w/ IV is that the movement takes a lot of its cues on fund development/ministry involvement from the traditional church missions world/models instead of movements or other more socially dynamic options.
If missions is the lone model then it's typically: pay, pray or get out of the way if you don't have a skill/gift set that directly relates to the ministry's end-users.
I assume a very strong alumni network would make IV here in SD more like a movement but I realized that schools that have a strong IV alumni presence also have a general strong alumni presence at the their universities and alas, UCSD does not.
Sarah -- You chose the right organizations to examine movements. From literally out of nothing, these organizations created rabid followings seemingly overnight. You could easily argue that their rapid rise in prominence outpaced hundreds of organizations that have 5,10,20, or even 50 more years in organizational history.
ReplyDeleteI'm anxious to hear more about how/why/what caused these rapid ascents!
Chris
welcome chris. miss the cohort.
ReplyDelete